Supreme Court Practices Supreme Hypocracy Dr. David J. Demko, Editor-in-Chief AgeVenture's ZOOMER NATION, www.demko.com, 06-01-2010 "Separation of church and state, zero tolerance for government support of religion." That's the opinion of our Supreme Court. Most Americans disagree, but the real tragedy here is the high court's un-Constitional practice of selecting who will and who will not receive Constitutional guarantees. That's right. The Justices do not practice what they preach. They say one thing, then do another." It's supreme hypocracy. The court says cooperation between church and state is un-Constitutional. Then, the Justices ignore their "church and state" policy as government aid pours into the religious state of Israel. This Constitutional exception does not apply to Muslims, Christians, Hindus or any one else for that matter. Such a self-contradictory policy puts America at peril because government aid to Israel appears morally right, politically prudent, and Constitutionally sound. But, why does the high court attack small town America for displaying the ten commandments, then ignore the government's gigantic support of a religious state? The court's position does not stand the test of logic, ethics or common sense. Is the Supreme Court interpreting two constitutions, one denouncing Church and State and another approving Church and State? History documents the high court's lengthy record of wrongful thinking ... allowing slavery, racial segregation, oppression of women's rights, 18 year olds are old enough to die for their country but prohibited from drinking whiskey. On the issue of church and state, the court is wrong again as evidenced by its blatant, prejudical profiling of who will and who will not be guaranteed Constitutional rights. The Supreme Court is preying on its own religious policy. Reader comments are welcome at: ZoomerNation@demko.com